Tue, 24 Oct 2017 08:28:00 +0100 Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> You’re describing exactly the problem that the split-resource > approach we’re talking about avoids. If you have nodes choose > node-specific resources for the clients, it’s not possible for there > to be a collision when the cluster merges after a partition. I also don't see how this is superior to just having resource -> node mapping in your table, e.g.: [email protected] -> [(resource1, node1), (resource2, node2)]. and generate resources for clients by yourself. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
