Sun, 03 Dec 2017 19:01:58 -0000 Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Version 0.4.0 of XEP-0363 (HTTP File Upload) has been released. The new element <retry/> is added within *existing* namespace. Now we have two different schemas with the same namespace. In the case you don't care: why didn't you add it inside 'jabber:client' namespace, then? Why do we need namespaces at all? Let's put any new elements inside 'jabber:client'. Also, I remind, that RFC6120 Section 11.4 says: > An implementation MAY choose to accept or send only data that has been > explicitly validated against the schemas provided in this document, > but such behavior is OPTIONAL So, this rule doesn't apply to XEPs schemas? In the case it does, what schema version should a server use to validate the content? In the case it doesn't, what a server should do with unknown element within *known* namespace (sic): dropping element? remain it untouched? The latter case is meaningless, because the idea of server-side validation is to prevent sending garbage to clients. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
