On 04.12.2017 09:53, Daniel Gultsch wrote: > I was considering to just move it up by one level. Validation may or > may not be an issue but I figured some libraries won't have a > getExtension or getChildren method on the error class if they don't > expect the class to have children. > Are there any other examples of XEPs 'extending' the error element?
It is perfectly fine where it is. See RFC 6120 ยง 8.3.2. and/or search for [OPTIONAL application-specific condition element] - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
