On 01/09/2018 05:03 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On 9 January 2018 at 04:19, Travis Burtrum <[email protected]> wrote: >> In my opinion, at least all of cannot-connect-to-port, non-XML, >> not-proper-stream and invalid TLS cert should trigger a fallback to the >> next highest priority SRV record. Everyone in the MUC seemed to agree >> if authentication fails a fallback would be a bad idea. > > What's the distinction between invalid TLS certificates and > authentication failure?
Ah, so the proposed c2s vs s2s distinction makes more sense. I was thinking authentication as in c2s username/password authentication. I'm not sure at what step s2s fallback should cease, I guess it should cease after you get a <stream> ? _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
