On 05/01/2018 10:46 AM, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
Tue, 1 May 2018 09:33:54 +0100
Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote:
I appreciate the sentiment, but as an implementer I'd want to know
about potential legal requirements of software I'm writing, so I can
then gain some more confidence about offering that software to
various jurisdictions, and can take these requirements into
consideration when designing the software.
You should consult lawyers then. Relying on a technical document
written by engineers shouldn't make you more confident in the questions
of law.
I wouldn't trust a document written by lawyers either, certainly not
when they are writing about technical implementation. I have seen too
much crap there and lawyers are also speculating until there is a
verdict from a judge (and even then...).
But on a more serious note: though we can't resolve legal issues in our
documents, we can point to some (potential) issues and preliminary
resolutions. With the analysis of GDPR issues, I noticed we can do quite
well there.
Winfried
--
privacy consultant e-health
+31.6.23303960
https://www.tilanus.com/
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
