On 12 July 2018 at 13:13, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm well aware why RSM allows inexact results. That is not what this PR > is about. > > I simply think it is an oversight that RSM does not signal if the > results are exact or not.
Then I think you didn't quite consider my points? The count can change at any time. So it may have been exact at the time of the query, but even by the time the client receives the count across the wire that count could be incorrect. What use is it for the client to know that the count was "exact" at some unknown point in recent history? Regards, Matthew _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
