On 20.11.18 15:54, Georg Lukas wrote: > * Tedd Sterr <[email protected]> [2018-11-15 20:41]: >> 8) PR #716 - XEP-0030: Clarify 'disco#info' feature in 'disco#info' >> responses - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/716 > > -1, but we should add the Note about examples not being normative.
The primary purpose of the (unwritten) rule that examples are considered non-normative is that broken examples cannot become or seen as correct behaviour as of the specification. Your suggestion would add another use case to the rule and explicitly encourage broken examples. I fail to see why we would want to do that. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
