On Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2019 20:48:15 CEST JC Brand wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:56:54PM +0200, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> > - Should we really require both BOSH and WebSockets for the Web Suite for
> > clients? Maybe it makes more sense to require it both for Servers, but
> > only
> > one of them for clients, possibly even phasing out BOSH. (Disclaimer: I’m
> > not a Web person).
> Looking at footnote 14, it appears as if only one of the two is required for
> compatibility, not both.

This is true, I overlooked that.

> That said, I agree that supporting only one web connection mechanism is
> enough.

For a web client application? Why not?

> If only BOSH is supported, then XEP-0198 isn't needed since it's not
> compatible with BOSH which in any case has its own session management
> protocol. This needs to be made explicit.

This is a good point.

kind regards,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org

Reply via email to