On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 12:35, Sam Whited <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we undefer XEP-0377: Spam Reporting? I don't have any changes that > need to be made to it, but it's also in use and not abandoned. It has > one or two implementations but I don't know of any services actually > using it so I don't think it's ready for advancement, but it definitely > shouldn't be deferred. >
Modulo Kim's comments, there's a simpler answer: No. If there are no changes to be made, then it's either ready for enhancement or needs dropping. Movement in and out of Deferred is automatic for a reason - it's to eliminate XEPs which aren't progressing through Experimental. We don't require implementations at the Experimental->Draft transition; we require them at the Draft->Final one. Getting widespread implementations before Draft is, in fact, a problem to the process - look at MAM, Carbons, and so on, which end up stuck in Experimental. Because moving things out of Deferred (or stopping them getting there) is just a minor edit away, there's no need to ask, anyway. But really, if there's some implementation but you think some more changes will be needed, then force the issue with a Last Call. (In this case, of course, sort through the changes Kim found discussed, first!) Dave.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
