Thank you, thinking about it more that makes perfect sense. I've submitted an overhaul based on the list feedback that Zash reminded me of.
—Sam On Mon, Jun 21, 2021, at 02:55, Dave Cridland wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 12:35, Sam Whited <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we undefer XEP-0377: Spam Reporting? I don't have any changes > > that need to be made to it, but it's also in use and not abandoned. > > It has one or two implementations but I don't know of any services > > actually using it so I don't think it's ready for advancement, but > > it definitely shouldn't be deferred. > > Modulo Kim's comments, there's a simpler answer: > > No. > > If there are no changes to be made, then it's either ready for > enhancement or needs dropping. > > Movement in and out of Deferred is automatic for a reason - it's to > eliminate XEPs which aren't progressing through Experimental. > > We don't require implementations at the Experimental->Draft > transition; we require them at the Draft->Final one. Getting > widespread implementations before Draft is, in fact, a problem to the > process - look at MAM, Carbons, and so on, which end up stuck in > Experimental. > > Because moving things out of Deferred (or stopping them getting there) > is just a minor edit away, there's no need to ask, anyway. But really, > if there's some implementation but you think some more changes will be > needed, then force the issue with a Last Call. > > (In this case, of course, sort through the changes Kim found > discussed, first!) > > Dave. > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list Info: > https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: Standards- > [email protected] <mailto:Standards-unsubscribe%40xmpp.org> > _______________________________________________ > -- Sam Whited _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
