Sep 26, 2022 7:42:48 AM Kevin Smith <[email protected]>: > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Matthew Wild" <[email protected]> > To: "XMPP Standards" <[email protected]> > Sent: 26/09/2022 18:24:37 > Subject: [Standards] Channel binding and token authentication > >> Does anyone have objections to proceeding with the definition of one >> or more HT-*-NONE mechanisms for token authentication? > > Seems entirely sensible to me.
I agree. (Selfishly, as the author of a proxy that would break channel binding) _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
