I'd get rid of <accept/> instead of <proceed/> Only put <proceed/> into the stanza. Don’t send <accept/> at all.
Stops you from having to put two elements in the message. What in the :0 version was <accept/> will just quietly go away. (In favor of wording around proceed being carbon copied) On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:49 AM Thilo Molitor <[email protected]> wrote: > > As discussed in the XSF MUC, I've updated XEP-0353 to use the old :0 > namespace, but still incorporate all features of the :1 namespace. > I had to water down some MUST of :1 to SHOULD to accomplish this. > I've also merged the <accept/> and <proceed/> elements into the same message > stanza in order to maintain backwards compatibility without introducing yet > another stanza stored into MAM etc. > > Please read this carefully to check if I did not miss anything still mandating > a namespace bump. > > Rendered version: https://dyn.eightysoft.de/final/xep-0353.html > Diff to the old :0 version 0.3.1: > https://dyn.eightysoft.de/final/jmi_diff.html > > The commit can be found in the following branch, I'm happy to take pull > requests fixing stuff I've missed: > https://github.com/tmolitor-stud-tu/xeps/tree/jmi0 > > -tmolitor > > > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
