Hi Goffi, I’m a bit conflicted on that. I’m a big proponent of using Experimental as a base for people to do experiments in (and I’m working hard to move everything that turned out to be both useful and working to stable). Furthermore I believe that "hybrid bridges" are something that we need to experiment with if we want to maintain our concept of bridges/gateways.
However as someone who has actually implemented XMPP<->PGP Encrypted emails before I’m also seeing a lot of challenges in this particular one and in hybrid bridges in general. On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 10:55 PM Marvin W <[email protected]> wrote: > A note on the procedure on specifying this: I think it would have been > better to first merge all of the three ProtoXEPs you proposed now in a > single Experimental XEP and see from there how it develops. The XEP can > still be split up in the same way as you did right now before moving to > Stable, but to me it feels more natural to have them all in one, as > changes to one are likely to affect the others and maybe during the > development we discover that a different way to split them makes more > sense. I’m with Marvin on this one. How about instead of handing out 3 XEP numbers we give you one to do your experiments in and we take it from there. I would like to see at least one other (experimental) gateway to proof out that this can actually be generalized. cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
