Hi Daniel, Le mardi 14 janvier 2025, 09:18:21 heure normale d’Europe centrale Daniel Gultsch a écrit : > Hi Goffi, > > I’m a bit conflicted on that. > I’m a big proponent of using Experimental as a base for people to do > experiments in (and I’m working hard to move everything that turned > out to be both useful and working to stable). > Furthermore I believe that "hybrid bridges" are something that we need > to experiment with if we want to maintain our concept of > bridges/gateways. > > However as someone who has actually implemented XMPP<->PGP Encrypted > emails before I’m also seeing a lot of challenges in this particular > one and in hybrid bridges in general.
I know that this is a challenge, and I think that experimental is for that: having a written specification help people to understand the feature and have test implementation. I believe that gateway e2ee is doable and necessary, and I have a working implementation in my email gateway (however, not yet perfect, as signing is not done at the moment, still better than plain text). > I’m with Marvin on this one. How about instead of handing out 3 XEP > numbers we give you one to do your experiments in and we take it from > there. I would like to see at least one other (experimental) gateway > to proof out that this can actually be generalized. Sure, as I've said in the other reply, I'm absolutely fine with that. Lets see if other people are interested in working on that. Of course there are not so many gateway developers, so it's more difficult to find than client developers. Best, Goffi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
