Martin, here is the fix to this bug: http://people.apache.org/~antonp/stdcxx06162006/scripts/
With best wishes, Anton Pevtsov -----Original Message----- From: Martin Sebor (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 23:38 To: [email protected] Subject: [jira] Updated: (STDCXX-202) [Windows] failed config tests labeled "ok" [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-202?page=all ] Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-202: -------------------------------- Attachment: log.text The full log file is attached. > [Windows] failed config tests labeled "ok" > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: STDCXX-202 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-202 > Project: C++ Standard Library > Type: Bug > Components: Configuration > Versions: 4.1.3 > Environment: Windows > Reporter: Martin Sebor > Assignee: Anton Pevtsov > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: log.text > > The Windows configuration infrastructure incorrectly labels some > failled tests as passing (i.e., "ok"). The labeling should be consistent across all config tests (i.e., "ok" when a test passes and "no (<macro-name>)" when it fails; <macro-name> is the name of the macro that is #defined in response to the failure; it should be enclosed in parentheses and the whole thing separated from the word "no" by a single space). > ------ Build started: Project: .configure, Configuration: 15d Debug Thread-safe > Dll Win32 ------ > Performing Custom Build Step > Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.6 > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001. All rights reserved. > Configuring for msvc-7.1 - 15d Debug Thread-safe Dll > Checking if compiler is sane... ok > Checking if linker is sane... ok > Checking if run environment is sane... ok > Checking system architecture ILP32 little endian > Checking for headers... > ... > Checking for <ieeefp.h>... no (_RWSTD_NO_IEEEFP_H) > Checking for <pthread.h>... no (_RWSTD_NO_PTHREAD_H) > Checking for namespaces ok > ... > Checking for std::vsprintf() in <cstdio>... ok > Checking for std::snprintf() in <cstdio>... no _RWSTD_NO_SNPRINTF > ... > checking for atomic operations... ok > checking for bad_alloc copy ctor... ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_COPY_CTOR > checking for bad_alloc default ctor... ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_DEFAULT_CTOR > checking for bad_alloc dtor... ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_DTOR > checking for bad_alloc::what()... ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_WHAT > ... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
