Option 3 sounds better, if option 3 is allowed. Otherwise option 2.
Yu (Scott) Zhong
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention
If we constrain ourselves to the proposed options, my vote is for Option
2. The reason for this vote is because it allows us to more easily
determine what regression tests need to be run for a particular change.
If we don't constrain ourselves to the proposed options, I wish to put
forward an additional option.
Option 3:
Put all regression tests in tests/regress/, using the following
naming convention:
tests/regress/<section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
This option would allow us to quickly locate all regression tests, and
identify which section each regression test applies to without
consulting Jira.
--Andrew Black
Martin Sebor wrote:
> I'm not hearing any yay's or nay's on the proposed convention
> so how about a vote to practice our consensus building skills?
> Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
>
> Option 1:
> Put all regression tests in tests/regress/, naming each as
> follows:
> tests/regress/stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
>
> Option 2:
> Mix regression tests in with the rest based on the clause
> in the standard and name each according to the following
> formula:
> tests/<section>/<section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
>
> Martin
