I suppose I should cast my own vote on this... Martin Sebor wrote:
I think the discussion has wound down so let's have a vote and decide whether stdcxx committers should follow the Commit-Then Review (CTR) or Review-Then-Commit (RTC) policy on stdcxx/trunk by default.[+1] All committers follow Commit-Then-Review for safe changes, Review-Then-Commit for potentially breaking changes. What constitutes a breakng change is a judgment call to be made by each committer. The rule of thumb is that changes which involve advanced/sophisticated C++ features, C99 features, or optional POSIX (and other) extensions may cause breakage on some platforms. [ -1] All committers follow Review-Then-Commit for all changes with no exceptions. [+0] New committers and committers who haven't been active in more than [5] months follow the RTC policy for at least [4] weeks of sustained activity, all others CTR. Please check the box you're voting for (or put +1/-1 in any or all of them). When voting for #3, also put numbers in the two [ ] boxes to complete the rules. Martin
