It's been well over 72 hours so it's time to tally up the vote:
everyone prefers to go option #1 (below). I will go ahead and
update the stdcxx web page accordingly.
[ ] All committers follow Commit-Then-Review for safe changes,
Review-Then-Commit for potentially breaking changes. What
constitutes a breakng change is a judgment call to be made
by each committer. The rule of thumb is that changes which
involve advanced/sophisticated C++ features, C99 features,
or optional POSIX (and other) extensions may cause breakage
on some platforms.
The vote detail is as follows:
6 votes strongly in favor of option #1 (above) and 0 against:
Andrew Black
Anton Pevtsov
Farid Zaripov
Liviu Nicoara
Martin Sebor
Bill Rowe
0 votes in favor of option #2 (see the [VOTE] thread), 1 neutral,
and 4 against. 1 and 1/2 vote in favor of option #3, 1 neutral,
one against.
Thanks
Martin
