This branch is now in the Apache STDCXX Subversion repository.  Read the
TODO file for some help getting started using the branch.

Note, this is just a baseline for further development.  Many of the
necessary config macros are not yet included in the branch.

Eric.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 5:39 PM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: GNU "Autotools" Branch?
> 
> Eric Lemings wrote:
> > I haven't tested it on any platform other than Mac OS X; 
> not all config
> > tests have been translated yet into M4 macros (especially 
> tests related
> > to linking); and those that have been written need a 
> thorough review as
> > well as some polishing.  So it's safe to say it's still very much in
> > development.
> > 
> > Once I get a successful 'distcheck', I'll create this branch in the
> > stdcxx/branches/autotools directory.  The baseline for this 
> branch will
> > only contain a scant few config macros initially along with 
> plenty of
> > guidance on writing the rest.  :)
> 
> Sounds good to me. Unless someone objects in the next, say, 48 hours
> go ahead and create the branch at your leisure. I assume you'll be
> branching off of trunk (as opposed to an existing branch).
> 
> Martin
> 
> > 
> > Brad.
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Martin Sebor
> >> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 4:01 PM
> >> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: GNU "Autotools" Branch?
> >>
> >> Eric Lemings wrote:
> >>> I have some code that I'd like to contribute to the Apache STDCXX
> >>> repository.  It adds support for the GNU "Autotools" 
> suite of tools
> >>> (i.e.
> >>> Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool).
> >>>  
> >>> Would a branch in the Subversion stdcxx/branches directory be the
> >>> appropriate place to check in this code?
> >> If you're still developing the code we can create a 
> branches/autotools
> >> branch for this work. But if it's already finished and 
> tested on all
> >> platforms we might want to think about rolling it into 4.3 instead
> >> (once it has been created).
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >>>  
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to