On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 09:25, Michael Foord <mich...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
>> Although adding a decorator based approach to argparse shouldn't be out of
>> the question. Then there really would be MTOWTDI...
>
> It's not, but then I would want it out in the wild first to work out
> the API, so still don't find it reasonable for this PEP.
It's out of scope for the PEP, but it's definitely under consideration
as a feature enhancement request for the next major version of
argparse. But that's really just like a feature request for any
library.
Steve
--
Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis?
Did Steve tell you that?
--- The Hiphopopotamus
_______________________________________________
stdlib-sig mailing list
stdlib-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
