stdlib-sig
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Messages by Date
2021/08/27
[stdlib-sig] Archiving this list
Brett Cannon
2017/09/15
[stdlib-sig] BLE Libraries for Windows-reg
Manikandan V via stdlib-sig
2017/01/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] gzip compression in http.server
Brett Cannon
2017/01/09
[stdlib-sig] gzip compression in http.server
md
2016/03/24
[stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved?
Random832
2016/02/27
[stdlib-sig] This mailing list is now under the PSF CoC
Brett Cannon
2015/12/03
Re: [stdlib-sig] Where should be put ABCs?
Guido van Rossum
2015/12/03
[stdlib-sig] Where should be put ABCs?
Brett Cannon
2015/07/24
Re: [stdlib-sig] argparse PathType class -- validate file/directory paths without opening them
Dan Lenski
2015/07/22
[stdlib-sig] argparse PathType class -- validate file/directory paths without opening them
Dan Lenski
2014/12/23
[stdlib-sig] Problem with the standard library
rohit . mukhedkar
2014/12/23
[stdlib-sig] Apologies ...
Geoff Clements
2014/12/23
[stdlib-sig] Bug report: httplib codec error
Bob Chen
2013/10/02
Re: [stdlib-sig] difflib on large files
Brett Cannon
2013/10/02
Re: [stdlib-sig] difflib on large files
Watson, Paul
2013/09/27
Re: [stdlib-sig] difflib on large files
Brett Cannon
2013/09/27
[stdlib-sig] difflib on large files
Watson, Paul
2013/04/27
Re: [stdlib-sig] binary logical operators in operator module
R. David Murray
2013/04/27
[stdlib-sig] binary logical operators in operator module
Gary Miguel
2012/12/20
Re: [stdlib-sig] Python3WOS has gone over 50%
fwierzbi...@gmail.com
2012/12/20
Re: [stdlib-sig] Python3WOS has gone over 50%
Barry Warsaw
2012/12/20
Re: [stdlib-sig] Python3WOS has gone over 50%
R. David Murray
2012/12/20
Re: [stdlib-sig] Python3WOS has gone over 50%
Barry Warsaw
2012/12/15
[stdlib-sig] Python3WOS has gone over 50%
Yuval Greenfield
2012/08/18
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Yuval Greenfield
2012/08/18
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Yuval Greenfield
2012/08/18
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Ned Deily
2012/08/18
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
M.-A. Lemburg
2012/08/18
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Mark Summerfield
2012/08/17
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
R. David Murray
2012/08/17
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Ned Deily
2012/08/17
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Brett Cannon
2012/08/17
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Guido van Rossum
2012/08/17
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Brett Cannon
2012/08/17
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Guido van Rossum
2012/08/17
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Yuval Greenfield
2012/08/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Ned Deily
2012/08/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Christian Heimes
2012/08/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Carl Friedrich Bolz
2012/08/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Brett Cannon
2012/08/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Antoine Pitrou
2012/08/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Christian Heimes
2012/08/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Brett Cannon
2012/08/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
M.-A. Lemburg
2012/08/16
[stdlib-sig] A game in the standard library
Yuval Greenfield
2012/06/05
Re: [stdlib-sig] argparse -- binary IO via standard streams
Michael Foord
2012/06/05
[stdlib-sig] argparse -- binary IO via standard streams
Moritz Klammler
2010/05/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] quoting arguments for command-line evaluation
Philip Jenvey
2010/05/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] quoting arguments for command-line evaluation
Paul Moore
2010/05/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] quoting arguments for command-line evaluation
Eric Smith
2010/05/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] quoting arguments for command-line evaluation
Éric Araujo
2010/05/24
Re: [stdlib-sig] quoting arguments for command-line evaluation
Ian Bicking
2010/05/24
Re: [stdlib-sig] quoting arguments for command-line evaluation
Bill Janssen
2010/05/24
Re: [stdlib-sig] quoting arguments for command-line evaluation
C. Titus Brown
2010/05/24
[stdlib-sig] quoting arguments for command-line evaluation
Bill Janssen
2010/03/05
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jesse Noller
2010/03/04
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2010/03/04
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Guido van Rossum
2010/03/04
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/03/04
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jesse Noller
2010/03/04
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/03/04
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jesse Noller
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jesse Noller
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Antoine Pitrou
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Antoine Pitrou
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jesse Noller
2010/02/25
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/02/23
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Guido van Rossum
2010/02/23
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brett Cannon
2010/02/23
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
sstein...@gmail.com
2010/02/23
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Guido van Rossum
2010/02/23
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2010/02/23
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/02/21
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2010/02/21
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/02/20
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2010/02/01
Re: [stdlib-sig] socket.makefile() questions
R. David Murray
2010/01/31
Re: [stdlib-sig] socket.makefile() questions
Timothy Bower
2010/01/31
Re: [stdlib-sig] socket.makefile() questions
Timothy Bower
2010/01/31
Re: [stdlib-sig] socket.makefile() questions
Antoine Pitrou
2010/01/31
Re: [stdlib-sig] socket.makefile() questions
Benjamin Peterson
2010/01/31
[stdlib-sig] socket.makefile() questions
tim
2010/01/28
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/01/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brett Cannon
2010/01/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Anh Hai Trinh
2010/01/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jesse Noller
2010/01/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/01/16
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Anh Hai Trinh
2010/01/15
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/01/15
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brett Cannon
2010/01/15
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Anh Hai Trinh
2010/01/15
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2010/01/15
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Anh Hai Trinh
2010/01/14
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2009/11/29
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/27
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2009/11/14
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Brett Cannon
2009/11/14
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Yuval Greenfield
2009/11/13
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Brett Cannon
2009/11/13
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/12
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2009/11/12
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2009/11/12
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2009/11/12
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2009/11/12
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Jeffrey Yasskin
2009/11/12
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2009/11/11
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/11
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Georg Brandl
2009/11/11
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/11
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Georg Brandl
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Ben Finney
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Ben Finney
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Leonardo Santagada
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Ned Deily
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Ronald Oussoren
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Ronald Oussoren
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Leonardo Santagada
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Ronald Oussoren
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Ned Deily
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] -Wi
Barry Warsaw
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Barry Warsaw
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] -Wi
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Barry Warsaw
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Barry Warsaw
2009/11/10
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Ned Deily
2009/11/10
[stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Nicolas Chauvat
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Yuval Greenfield
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Laura Creighton
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Kevin Teague
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Laura Creighton
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Yuvgoog Greenle
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Kevin Teague
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Philip Jenvey
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Raymond Hettinger
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
geremy condra
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and hownoisy they are)
Raymond Hettinger
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Yuvgoog Greenle
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
M.-A. Lemburg
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Brett Cannon
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Ben Finney
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Jesse Noller
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Yuvgoog Greenle
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Brett Cannon
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Brett Cannon
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Georg Brandl
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Yuvgoog Greenle
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
sstein...@gmail.com
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
sstein...@gmail.com
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Guido van Rossum
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Tim Head
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Laura Creighton
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Laura Creighton
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Yuvgoog Greenle
2009/11/09
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Yuvgoog Greenle
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution
Brian Quinlan
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Laura Creighton
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Kevin Teague
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Ben Finney
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Laura Creighton
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Antoine Pitrou
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
nathan binkert
2009/11/08
Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)
Brett Cannon
Earlier messages