Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le mardi 15 septembre 2009 à 17:14 -0400, R. David Murray a écrit :
Actually I believe I heard from someone other than Laura that required
options were explicitly rejected.
This is one of the reasons why I'm against exclusive module ownership.
If a reasonable number of people think a feature would benefit the
community, the module owner shouldn't be able to veto it on ideological
(or whatever other personal) grounds.
I dislike exclusive module ownership too. We end up in situations where
modules (like ElementTree) are 'owned' by someone who is absent and
no-one else is able to (or dares to) touch the code.
Michael
In any case, this is not directly an argument against optparse itself,
if someone (Armin?) decides to maintain it with a more open attitude.
_______________________________________________
stdlib-sig mailing list
stdlib-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
_______________________________________________
stdlib-sig mailing list
stdlib-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
