On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > Le mardi 15 septembre 2009 à 18:38 -0400, R. David Murray a écrit : >> >> Table (1) would list, I propose, three categories of people: >> (a) 'official maintainer(s)', (b) experts, and (c) contributors. > > This is too complicated IMO. > (a) + (b) is very sufficient and perhaps still not simple enough. > I don't see any strong difference between maintainers and experts. > As for casual contributors, I don't see any point in an exhaustive > listing of them (which, depending on the module, may be very long and > tedious and maintain).
but hey, if they're willing to write out all that info antoine ;) I think Antoine has a good point here. Can we start shorter (and simpler)? >> An 'official maintainer' would be someone willing to take more-or-less >> full responsibility for a module (such as Jesse for Multiprocessing). > > I don't think "full responsibility" is a good thing. See my other > message (at 00:52 CEST) for why I think so. Let's just stick to "tinpot maintainer" ;) jesse _______________________________________________ stdlib-sig mailing list stdlib-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
