Vinay Sajip schrieb: > Thomas Heller <thel...@...> writes: >> >> Although I like and use logging, I belong more to the hatred people >> for the logging configuration. >> > > I don't blame you. It's partly, though not all, a ConfigParser thing. The > difficulty for me with configuration is, there's very little chance of a > consensus for how it should work. Everybody will have their opinion, they'll > all > have good points, but nobody will agree :-( Backwards compatibility might be > manageable, if we stick to a ConfigParser format and introduce a "version" key > somewhere.
You should be fine with me: I don't care because I don't the config files. >> What I am really missing is a way to do basic logging configuration (calling >> logging.basicConfig(...)) with some command line args for the Python >> interpreter. I have suggested that before IIRC, but it doesn't seem to fly. > > Can you point me to a ticket or post about it? I'm not sure there is a ticket or feature request for it - probably not. What I would like to see is something like this: python -L level=DEBUG script.py scriptargs ... which then calls import logging; logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG) Unfortunately it's not possible to access command line arguments in sitecustomize.py, otherwise I would have hacked it there... -- Thanks, Thomas _______________________________________________ stdlib-sig mailing list stdlib-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
