Bogdan - thanks for the input.  I suspected there was a reason this feature
didn't exist.  As the new guy, I never meant to disrespect the current GUI
philosophies or the work you've done.  What you guys have already created
is awesome!  I don't want to make it worse.

A plugin sounds like a good approach.  I will investigate.  I surely never
meant to hack anything together, and I definitely haven't committed
anything.  I just need a little direction from management (if there is such
a thing?).

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Thomas Morris <tom.s.mor...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Brian,
>
> Perhaps this could be implemented as a plug-in? ("extended DSO
> controls" or something like that). Personally I would like some
> extended controls particularly for making full use of the new NGC data
> catalogue. (Galaxy display based on surface brightness for example,
> which would certainly be useful for objects at low altitude.)
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
> On 19 March 2012 17:03, Bogdan Marinov <daggers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:48 AM, bdwashbu <bdwas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Cool!
> >>
> >> I have a prototype image here:
> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/81471534@N00/6848489598/lightbox/
> >
> > Oh, my, more interface clutter. While users have requested a way to
> > select which categories of DSOs are displayed, I think that a separate
> > slider for each is overkill.
> >
> > Also, a comment on a previous question of yours:
> >
> > On 18 March 2012 14:15, bdwashbu <bdwas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I also think that the sliders should be ticked and a label show their
> >> current value, because I'm not even sure what their value currently
> >> represents. (I assume apparent magnitude)
> >
> > The sliders are deliberately unitless and don't represent apparent
> > magnitude. Instead, they control the number of objects shown on the
> > screen with a somewhat unclear formula which includes apparent
> > magnitude and dynamic eye adaptation.
> >
> > Please also have in mind that one of the reasons Stellarium is popular
> > with educators and people who are total beginners in astronomy is the
> > simplicity of its interface. New features should be carefully
> > designed. Just slapping hack over hack as has been the tendency
> > recently won't lead to anything good. We already kicked out the
> > planetarium users, let's not alienate more groups.
> >
> > Bogdan
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF email is sponsosred by:
> > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
> > _______________________________________________
> > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list
> > Stellarium-pubdevel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF email is sponsosred by:
> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
> _______________________________________________
> Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list
> Stellarium-pubdevel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list
Stellarium-pubdevel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel

Reply via email to