On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Erik Carstensen <[email protected]>wrote:
> b. if (1) fails, end up in the intermediate state 'stg pop' would give; if > 4 fails, just roll back 4. > > I don't like (b), because it makes me lose the stack top. > Speaking of which: A fairly common pattern is that I do a 'sink' or 'refresh' which generates conflicts. After resolving the conflicts, I must manually finish the interrupted operation (squash + goto for refresh, goto for sink). Would it make sense to add a stg equivalent of 'git rebase --continue', to proceed a previously interrupted command?
_______________________________________________ stgit-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/stgit-users
