On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Erik Carstensen <[email protected]> wrote: > Speaking of which: A fairly common pattern is that I do a 'sink' or > 'refresh' which generates conflicts. After resolving the conflicts, I must > manually finish the interrupted operation (squash + goto for refresh, goto > for sink). Would it make sense to add a stg equivalent of 'git rebase > --continue', to proceed a previously interrupted command?
Yes, I think so. The crucial thing such a universal retry command would need is that the thing it's supposed to do next is well-defined in all cases (or that it can reliably detect the cases where it's not, and error out). -- Karl Wiberg, [email protected] subrabbit.wordpress.com www.treskal.com/kalle _______________________________________________ stgit-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/stgit-users
