On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:38:01 +0200 Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori schrieb: > > (...) > > >> What is the preferred approach to delete the targets via tgt-admin? > >> > >> 1) delete only the targets which have no initiators connected - this is > >> what we do right now; we offline them before we try to delete > >> > >> 2) delete ALL targets, even if initiators are connected (supported since > >> "support to close a connection by force and to shut down tgtd") > > (...) > > > I think that the majority of administrators will use a user-friendly > > tool like tgt-admin (possible alternatives are web interface, or shell > > interface as many appliances do). So I expect people want to do common > > operations with it. The above two operations are often used, I guess. > > IMHO it would make sense to make two "delete" options then: > > --delete <ALL|tid=|targetname> > > It would only touch the target if it is not in use. > ALL would delete all targets which are not in use; the targets which have > initiators connected would not have its state changed (some informational > message would be displayed to the user). > > --forcedelete <ALL|tid=|targetname> > > It would delete the targets irrespectively of their use. How about the followings? (--force) --delete <ALL|tid=|targetname> It would only touch the target if it is not in use. If an active target (or targets due to ALL) is specified, the warnings shows up. If --force option is enabled, it would delete the targets irrespectively of their use. _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel
