On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:56:44 +0200 Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori schrieb: > > (...) > > >> --delete <ALL|tid=|targetname> > >> > >> It would only touch the target if it is not in use. > >> ALL would delete all targets which are not in use; the targets which have > >> initiators connected would not have its state changed (some informational > >> message would be displayed to the user). > >> > >> --forcedelete <ALL|tid=|targetname> > >> > >> It would delete the targets irrespectively of their use. > > > > How about the followings? > > > > (--force) --delete <ALL|tid=|targetname> > > > > It would only touch the target if it is not in use. If an active > > target (or targets due to ALL) is specified, the warnings shows up. > > > > If --force option is enabled, it would delete the targets > > irrespectively of their use. > > I thought about it, but we have already: > > -f, --force don't exit on tgtadm errors > > And I couldn't come up with a better name than "force" ;) > > Since tgt-admin still changes a lot, perhaps it would be better to rename the > current "--force" into something like "--ignore-errors". Sounds more sane. Any other comments? If we can't change the command line now, we can't change the format too. _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel
