Kamal I think we should organize to get the infrastructure running on some external servers first and then look to migrate to Apache hosted runtime. There are two reasons:
1. I think it will place less burden on the infra team that way as we will have the system up and running. 2. While Apache does have MSDN licenses it can use to do this, I think it will be a change to the current model to have Windows servers running under Apache's aegis. I assume it will mean new machines needing to be installed, so I think it would be good to have a clear idea of exactly what is required, what pre-reqs etc before we require this. I will bring this up on infrastructure@ and start the discussion there. Paul On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Chamith Kumarage <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi - As a person who's involved in the infrastructure related work, I > would like to help to carry on this process, if someone can help me to > figure out the current infrastructure facilities we have in Apache or > any other place. > > Thanks, > ~Chamith > > > On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 21:30 +0000, Kamaljit Bath wrote: >> I think this was discussed in the very beginning, but I would again like to >> explore the possibility of hosting service end-points for all Stonehenge >> apps on some Apache servers. >> >> Does Apache have such services available? >> What are the requirements to use them? >> What will be the SLA's to keep them up and running? >> Other logistical questions? >> >> If we can get these up and running, I think it will really showcase >> transparency, enhance interop scenarios and testing etc. >> >> Regards, >> kamal > > -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 Apache Synapse PMC Chair OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [email protected] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
