My question was more for Linux users. I'm assuming windows users are fine with having .NET src/bins.
My vote is for option #1 ________________________________________ From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 12:06 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Finalizing Release artifacts for M1 Hi Ben, For each src and binary artifact, we have to have a linux version and windows version. src version can include .NET sources in both places. We have to remove .NET binaries from linux binary dist. If your question is for windows users, then yes, it is a problem. They have to download .NET as well. Regards, Shankar On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Ben Dewey <[email protected]> wrote: > From an interopability standpoint I would vote for #1. My only thought is > if you want the PHP/WSAS/MySQL to exist as a download seperate from .NET how > would that be handled? > > ________________________________________ > From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Finalizing Release artifacts for M1 > > Hi, > > We have to finalize what are the release artifacts we are going to release. > I can think of two options. > > Option 1 > ------------- > > stonehenge-stocktrader-m1-incubating-src > | > |- dotnet src > | > |- php src > | > |- wsas src > > > stonehenge-stocktrader-m1-incubating > | > |- dotnet bin > | > |- php (same as src, packed in both places) > | > |- wsas bin > > Here we have only two artifacts, but if somebody needs to check only one of > the implementation, still they have to download all the other > implementations > > as well. > > > Option 2 > -------------- > stonehenge-stocktrader-dotnet-m1-incubating > stonehenge-stocktrader-dotnet-m1-incubating-src > stonehenge-stocktrader-php-m1-incubating > stonehenge-stocktrader-wsas-m1-incubating > stonehenge-stocktrader-wsas-m1-incubating-src > > Here, the number of artifacts are high. But users can download individual > implementations. > > I prefer option 1. What others are thinking? > > > In addition to that, all the artifacts should contain following files: > * DISCLAIMER > * LICENSE > * NOTICE > * README > * Release-Note > > NOTICE file will have only Apache Licence. Do we have to add any other > information? > > Also, We can generate pdf from wiki page (installation guide) and include > in > the release packages. Should any other files be added? Any comments? > > Regards, > Shankar > > -- > S.Uthaiyashankar > Software Architect > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" > -- S.Uthaiyashankar Software Architect WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
