Hi, I have added LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER and README to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stonehenge/trunk/stocktrader
Please review and send the comments (Specially NOTICE, whether we have to include any other copyright statements). We might have to improve README a bit. Regards, Shankar On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > We have to finalize what are the release artifacts we are going to release. > I can think of two options. > > Option 1 > ------------- > > stonehenge-stocktrader-m1-incubating-src > | > |- dotnet src > | > |- php src > | > |- wsas src > > > stonehenge-stocktrader-m1-incubating > | > |- dotnet bin > | > |- php (same as src, packed in both places) > | > |- wsas bin > > Here we have only two artifacts, but if somebody needs to check only one of > the implementation, still they have to download all the other > implementations > > as well. > > > Option 2 > -------------- > stonehenge-stocktrader-dotnet-m1-incubating > stonehenge-stocktrader-dotnet-m1-incubating-src > stonehenge-stocktrader-php-m1-incubating > stonehenge-stocktrader-wsas-m1-incubating > stonehenge-stocktrader-wsas-m1-incubating-src > > Here, the number of artifacts are high. But users can download individual > implementations. > > I prefer option 1. What others are thinking? > > > In addition to that, all the artifacts should contain following files: > * DISCLAIMER > * LICENSE > * NOTICE > * README > * Release-Note > > NOTICE file will have only Apache Licence. Do we have to add any other > information? > > Also, We can generate pdf from wiki page (installation guide) and include > in the release packages. Should any other files be added? Any comments? > > Regards, > Shankar > > -- > S.Uthaiyashankar > Software Architect > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" > > > -- S.Uthaiyashankar Software Architect WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
