[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12707225#action_12707225
]
S.Uthaiyashankar commented on STONEHENGE-21:
--------------------------------------------
I agree, when you have 4 DOTNET clients, you can't make them to talk to
different BS.
So, when you say ClientName and ServerName, is it an identifier given to a
client as part of configuration? (e.g. dotnet_client_1, dotnet_client_2,
dotnet_bs_5, etc.?) Or is it actual end point address?
> Having a unified configuration system
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: STONEHENGE-21
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
> Project: Stonehenge
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: S.Uthaiyashankar
> Fix For: M2
>
>
> Currently, .NET Services and PHP/WSAS Services are configured differently.
> .NET uses file based configuration and PHP/WSAS uses database configurations.
> We have to find a common mechanism to store the configurations. One option is
> to have a configuration service and then all the other services request
> endpoint details from configuration service.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
