[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12710835#action_12710835
]
Ben Dewey commented on STONEHENGE-21:
-------------------------------------
I was in the process of mocking a potential .NET Config Service Contract based
on PHP and I noticed that the PHP config service has the following actions.
- OPSConfigRequest
- ActiveDB
- GetActiveDB
- BSConfigRequest
- ClientToBS
- ServiceLocation
- GetClientToBSConnections
- BSToOPS
- DBConfig
- GetServiceLocations
- GetBSToOPSConnections
- ClientConfigRequest
- GetDBConfigs
When I was navigating the site with TCPMon enabled the only actions that got
invoked were
- ClientConfigRequest
- BSConfigRequest
Are any other actions actually being used in production? Should the .NET
Client implement all these actions, or just the active ones?
> Having a unified configuration system
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: STONEHENGE-21
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
> Project: Stonehenge
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: S.Uthaiyashankar
> Fix For: M2
>
>
> Currently, .NET Services and PHP/WSAS Services are configured differently.
> .NET uses file based configuration and PHP/WSAS uses database configurations.
> We have to find a common mechanism to store the configurations. One option is
> to have a configuration service and then all the other services request
> endpoint details from configuration service.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
