Stand by a few I want to test something ________________________________________ From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 3)
Yes, I am using "Call buildDotNet.cmd" . Exit statement causes the trouble. I tried "start BuildDotNet.cmd" as well, and my batch file continues without waiting for the script to finish. Shall I remove the exit statement? In that case, "call " works.. Regards, Shankar On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Drew Baird (Volt) <[email protected]> wrote: > Try "Call BuildDotNet.cmd" > > > ________________________________________ > From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 3) > > Thanks Drew, > > I am having another problem as well. I wrote a batch file to create > the binary distribution, which calls above BuildDotNet.cmd file. The > exit statement in last line of BuildDotNet.cmd causes the batch file > (which call's the BuildDotNet.cmd) to exit without proceeding.. Do you > have any idea how we can fix it? > > Regards, > Shankar > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Drew Baird (Volt) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> It is recommended that Visual Studio run in Administrative mode. I just >> carried that forward. Now that we are building with msbuild it may not. I >> will remove the echo then I am done. >> >> Regards, >> Drew >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:58 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 3) >> >> Hi Drew, >> >> I saw you have committed the new script. Is it done or you have to do >> some more stuff? >> >> Also, I have a small question regarding the script. Why do we have to >> run in Administrator mode? I tried to run as normal user, and it >> worked without any problem. Can we remove that echo?? >> >> Regards, >> Shankar >> >> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Drew Baird (Volt) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I will get those changes. >>> Drew >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:15 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 3) >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We need to fix some of the .NET build file issue. See the following >>> comments from Sebb in the gene...@incubator list >>> >>> ===== >>> >>> The build file for the .NET code assumes that the code is being built >>> from SVN, and tries to update the current directory. This is not >>> appropriate for a source code archive, which should be self-contained >>> (apart from any 3rd party dependencies, which should be documented.). >>> The build file should check that any required environment variables >>> are set up and exit with an error if not. Also any required settings >>> should be documented somewhere, preferably in the script as well as in >>> the top-level README or BUILDING file. >>> >>> ==== >>> >>> Can somebody familiar with .NET build system fix it and let me know, >>> so that I can pack again and go for a vote again? >>> >>> We also should have a common build file to get binary distribution >>> from src distribution. I am working on that. We need that as well for >>> M1 release. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shankar. >>> >>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Thank you everyone for voting.Vote was open for at least 72 hours and >>>> I am closing it now. >>>> >>>> We have eight +1 and no 0 or -1 votes. >>>> +1 votes are from >>>> *Kent Brown >>>> *Ben Dewey >>>> *Kamaljit Bath >>>> *Nandana Mihindukulasooriya >>>> *Abu Obeida Bakhach >>>> *Chintana Wilamuna >>>> *Paul Fremantle >>>> *Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar >>>> >>>> I'll send a mail to incubator general list for approval. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Shankar >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/take3/ >>>>> >>>>> The key is here: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/take3/KEYS >>>>> >>>>> RAT reports are here: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/take3/ >>>>> >>>>> This release is tagged at: >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stonehenge/tags/stonehenge_m1_incubator_take3/ >>>>> >>>>> Note: The changes between this and the first take >>>>> (1) Artifacts are built from tag >>>>> Note: The changes between this and the second take >>>>> (1) zip and tar.gz binary artifacts are having same content. >>>>> (2) License header comments are added to documents. >>>>> (3) Dependency information is added to site document. >>>>> (4) LICENSE, NOTICE are moved to top-level of the tag/branch. >>>>> (5) PDF documents generated from wiki are checked-in to branch. >>>>> >>>>> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache >>>>> Stonehenge M1 release. >>>>> >>>>> Vote open for 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> Here is my vote +1. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Shankar >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> S.Uthaiyashankar >>>> Software Architect >>>> WSO2 Inc. >>>> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> S.Uthaiyashankar >>> Software Architect >>> WSO2 Inc. >>> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" >> >> >> >> -- >> S.Uthaiyashankar >> Software Architect >> WSO2 Inc. >> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" > > > > -- > S.Uthaiyashankar > Software Architect > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" -- S.Uthaiyashankar Software Architect WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
