Hi Drew, yes, I'll do the modifications and commit it.
Regards, Shankar On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Drew Baird (Volt) <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes let's remove that and the pause as well. As long as the "error traps" set > the ERRORLEVEL to a non zero we are good. > > Let's take the pause out as well then it will fit into a standard form for a > system of cmd files. > > I assume you have the changes ready to commit? > > Thanks! > Drew > > > ________________________________________ > From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 3) > > Yes, I am using "Call buildDotNet.cmd" . Exit statement causes the trouble. > > I tried "start BuildDotNet.cmd" as well, and my batch file continues > without waiting for the script to finish. > > Shall I remove the exit statement? In that case, "call " works.. > > Regards, > Shankar > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Drew Baird (Volt) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Try "Call BuildDotNet.cmd" >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:20 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 3) >> >> Thanks Drew, >> >> I am having another problem as well. I wrote a batch file to create >> the binary distribution, which calls above BuildDotNet.cmd file. The >> exit statement in last line of BuildDotNet.cmd causes the batch file >> (which call's the BuildDotNet.cmd) to exit without proceeding.. Do you >> have any idea how we can fix it? >> >> Regards, >> Shankar >> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Drew Baird (Volt) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It is recommended that Visual Studio run in Administrative mode. I just >>> carried that forward. Now that we are building with msbuild it may not. I >>> will remove the echo then I am done. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Drew >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:58 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 3) >>> >>> Hi Drew, >>> >>> I saw you have committed the new script. Is it done or you have to do >>> some more stuff? >>> >>> Also, I have a small question regarding the script. Why do we have to >>> run in Administrator mode? I tried to run as normal user, and it >>> worked without any problem. Can we remove that echo?? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shankar >>> >>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Drew Baird (Volt) >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I will get those changes. >>>> Drew >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:15 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 3) >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We need to fix some of the .NET build file issue. See the following >>>> comments from Sebb in the gene...@incubator list >>>> >>>> ===== >>>> >>>> The build file for the .NET code assumes that the code is being built >>>> from SVN, and tries to update the current directory. This is not >>>> appropriate for a source code archive, which should be self-contained >>>> (apart from any 3rd party dependencies, which should be documented.). >>>> The build file should check that any required environment variables >>>> are set up and exit with an error if not. Also any required settings >>>> should be documented somewhere, preferably in the script as well as in >>>> the top-level README or BUILDING file. >>>> >>>> ==== >>>> >>>> Can somebody familiar with .NET build system fix it and let me know, >>>> so that I can pack again and go for a vote again? >>>> >>>> We also should have a common build file to get binary distribution >>>> from src distribution. I am working on that. We need that as well for >>>> M1 release. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Shankar. >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you everyone for voting.Vote was open for at least 72 hours and >>>>> I am closing it now. >>>>> >>>>> We have eight +1 and no 0 or -1 votes. >>>>> +1 votes are from >>>>> *Kent Brown >>>>> *Ben Dewey >>>>> *Kamaljit Bath >>>>> *Nandana Mihindukulasooriya >>>>> *Abu Obeida Bakhach >>>>> *Chintana Wilamuna >>>>> *Paul Fremantle >>>>> *Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar >>>>> >>>>> I'll send a mail to incubator general list for approval. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Shankar >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here: >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/take3/ >>>>>> >>>>>> The key is here: >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/take3/KEYS >>>>>> >>>>>> RAT reports are here: >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/take3/ >>>>>> >>>>>> This release is tagged at: >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stonehenge/tags/stonehenge_m1_incubator_take3/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Note: The changes between this and the first take >>>>>> (1) Artifacts are built from tag >>>>>> Note: The changes between this and the second take >>>>>> (1) zip and tar.gz binary artifacts are having same content. >>>>>> (2) License header comments are added to documents. >>>>>> (3) Dependency information is added to site document. >>>>>> (4) LICENSE, NOTICE are moved to top-level of the tag/branch. >>>>>> (5) PDF documents generated from wiki are checked-in to branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache >>>>>> Stonehenge M1 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is my vote +1. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Shankar >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> S.Uthaiyashankar >>>>> Software Architect >>>>> WSO2 Inc. >>>>> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> S.Uthaiyashankar >>>> Software Architect >>>> WSO2 Inc. >>>> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> S.Uthaiyashankar >>> Software Architect >>> WSO2 Inc. >>> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" >> >> >> >> -- >> S.Uthaiyashankar >> Software Architect >> WSO2 Inc. >> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" > > > > -- > S.Uthaiyashankar > Software Architect > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" -- S.Uthaiyashankar Software Architect WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
