On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Ben Dewey <[email protected]> wrote: > Avantika, > > Glad to hear your enthusiasm. The reason I wanted to build a .NET config > service is to provide a common interface for the Configuration UI (+1 btw). > This is currently being discussed in the comments thread of ticket > STONEHENGE-21 [1]. I put this on hold based on Shankar's recommendation that > we should spec the UI before creating the .NET config service. > > Shankar, > > Can you please provide more detail regarding the best course of action for > creating the Config UI. What were you thinking? Web interface, Desktop, CLI? > What language/platform?
Are we going to have only one implementation or one per platform? (e:g .net , php) If it is one, I prefer php (no, no, I am not biased :D ) since we can use same in linux as well. Personally I feel we should integrate this with our stocktrader frontend, so that we will have one in php and one in .net WDYT? Regards, Shankar > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:11 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Improving the usability of Stocktrader > > Hi everyone, > > My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of > Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer. > > I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of > the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of > a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was > also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the > configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys > think. > > I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge! > > Thanks, > Avantika > -- S.Uthaiyashankar Software Architect WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
