-----Original Message----- From: Chintana Wilamuna [mailto:[email protected]]
>> That being said, I don't think that the RUBY (or SPRING for that matter) >> should be in the trunk. > Why? > The point of the Stonehenge project is to encourage interoperability between different Web service frameworks. Ruby one is developed using Ruby on Rails and WSF/Ruby - http://wso2.org/projects/wsf/ruby and I think it'll provide a nice use case/example of interop. with other platforms. I was talking about the DB entries for RUBY/SPRING. I'm all for the being committed when they're tested (and thank you for volunteering). But as long as they're in the contrib, there shouldn't be any remains of them in trunk. Same procedure that Metro is going thru.
