On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Ben Dewey<[email protected]> wrote:
> That being said, I don't think that the RUBY (or SPRING for that matter) > should be in the trunk. Why? The point of the Stonehenge project is to encourage interoperability between different Web service frameworks. Ruby one is developed using Ruby on Rails and WSF/Ruby - http://wso2.org/projects/wsf/ruby and I think it'll provide a nice use case/example of interop. with other platforms. > Additionally, any Ruby developers out there who want to evaluate the validity > of the Ruby implementation in contrib, please do. Also anyone on the list > who knows any Ruby developers who may be interested please encourage them to > join the list and speak up. I'll try to test it with the latest releases and make it ready to be moved into trunk. Bye, -Chintana -- http://engwar.com/
