This is an internal code change thing and thus doesn't need PMC approval. Could have even been done lazy consensus.
Dan On Thu September 3 2009 2:07:45 pm Ben Dewey wrote: > Ping Mentors/Daniel: > > Sorry to pester, but it's been a week and I haven't heard anything from the > mentors. We have +9 votes to move Metro to the trunk and I would greatly > appreciate some buy in before proceeding. > > -Ben Dewey > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Dewey > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk > > Ping Mentors: > > Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC > > voting? > > We currently have 9 +1 votes, no 0 votes, and no -1 votes. Is it okay if > we move metro over to trunk? > > -Ben Dewey > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Dewey > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:09 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk > > I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk, We've had > a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of > some endpoint name conflicts. > > I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict. The work the > METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can > test and prepare for our next release. Any further issues can be > addressed when the code is moved to trunk. > > > > > Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote. > > Here's my vote +1. > > -Ben Dewey > > > Mentors, > > Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC > voting? > -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
