Hi Ben, I've tested the Metro code, and it works fine and looks good in my machine with SQL Server.
Kent, Harold, Do you have any comments? If not, I'll resolve the tickets as #1. On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Ben Dewey <[email protected]> wrote: > Everyone, > > Metro has been committed for over a week now, has anyone had a chance to > take a look? Any comments/thoughts on Steps 1-4 below? > > > > Kent, Harold, Ming, > > If everything looks good can you resolve your tickets in JIRA. See #1 > below. > > > -Ben Dewey > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Dewey [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 2:08 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk > > Metro has been moved over to the Trunk and the dotnet code to support it > has also moved over. I tested it and it works fine. > > Thanks to everyone for you votes and help. Below are a few next steps that > I can think of. > > > Next Steps: > > 1. Test, Test, Test, and Resolve STONEHENGE-69,70,71,90,93 > 2. Update build scripts. I updated the windows .bat version, anyone > running linux can you update the .sh? > 3. Move documentation to WIKI > 4. Add Metro to interop guide on Wiki > > > -Ben Dewey > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 12:58 PM > To: Ben Dewey > Cc: '[email protected]' > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk > > > This is an internal code change thing and thus doesn't need PMC approval. > Could have even been done lazy consensus. > > Dan > > > On Thu September 3 2009 2:07:45 pm Ben Dewey wrote: > > Ping Mentors/Daniel: > > > > Sorry to pester, but it's been a week and I haven't heard anything from > the > > mentors. We have +9 votes to move Metro to the trunk and I would > greatly > > appreciate some buy in before proceeding. > > > > -Ben Dewey > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ben Dewey > > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 PM > > To: '[email protected]' > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk > > > > Ping Mentors: > > > Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC > > > voting? > > > > We currently have 9 +1 votes, no 0 votes, and no -1 votes. Is it okay if > > we move metro over to trunk? > > > > -Ben Dewey > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ben Dewey > > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:09 PM > > To: '[email protected]' > > Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk > > > > I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk, We've > had > > a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception > of > > some endpoint name conflicts. > > > > I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict. The work > the > > METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can > > test and prepare for our next release. Any further issues can be > > addressed when the code is moved to trunk. > > > > > > > > > > Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote. > > > > Here's my vote +1. > > > > -Ben Dewey > > > > > > Mentors, > > > > Does the contrib code look good (legally)? Does this require any PMC > > voting? > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > -- Ming Jin Consultant Thoughtworks, Inc Mobile: +44 07503 144174(London) +86 135 2125 6300(Beijing) Gtalk: [email protected] MSN: [email protected] Blog: http://blogjava.net/mingj Twitter: https://twitter.com/mingjin
