> 
> Brzezinski/CFR War Plans in 1997 Book: The Grand Chessboard
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> NOTE: this communication has been RATED IN THE SUBJECT LINE, thus:
> * : of possible interest or amusement-value; worth a glance
> ** : interesting; of modest import; a must-SKIM
> *** : very interesting; of high import; vital; a must-READ
> **** : extremely interesting; essential; critical; a must-STUDY
> All in my best estimation. Your Mileage May Vary. *Caveat Surfor!*
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> "The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR,
> The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David
> Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and
> are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the
> next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They
> are fighting against citizens." -- Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D.,
> former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO
> Secretary General Manfred Werner
> 
> "[Brzezinski notes], quite clearly (p.53) that any nation that might
> become predominant in Central Asia would directly threaten the
> current U.S. control of oil resources in the Persian Gulf. In
> reading the book it becomes clear why the U.S. had a direct motive
> for the looting of some $300 billion in Russian assets during the
> 1990s, destabilizing Russia's currency (1998) and ensuring that a
> weakened Russia would have to look westward to Europe for economic
> and political survival, rather than southward to Central Asia. A
> dependent Russia would lack the military, economic and political
> clout to exert influence in the region and this weakening of
> Russia would explain why Russian President Vladimir Putin has been
> such a willing ally of U.S. efforts to date."
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR Put War Plans In a 1997 Book
> 
> It Is "A Blueprint for World Dictatorship," Says a Former German
> Defense and NATO Official Who Warned of Global Domination in 1984,
> in an Exclusive Interview With FTW
> 
> by Michael C. Ruppert
> 
> [Copyright 2001. All Rights Reserved, Michael C. Ruppert and From
> The Wilderness Publications, www.copvcia.com  May be copied or
> distributed for non-profit purposes only. Posting on any ".com"
> web site is prohibited without express written consent from the
> author.]
> 
> "THE GRAND CHESSBOARD - American Primacy And It's Geostrategic
> Imperatives," Zbigniew Brzezinski, Basic Books, 1997.
> 
> These are the very first words in the book: "Ever since the
> continents started interacting politically, some five hundred
> years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power." - p. xiii.
> 
> Eurasia is all of the territory east of Germany and Poland,
> stretching all the way through Russia and China to the Pacific
> Ocean. It includes the Middle East and most of the Indian
> subcontinent. The key to controlling Eurasia, says Brzezinski, is
> controlling the Central Asian Republics. And the key to
> controlling the Central Asian republics is Uzbekistan. Thus, it
> comes as no surprise that Uzbekistan was forcefully mentioned by
> President George W. Bush in his address to a joint session of
> Congress just days after the attacks of September 11 as the very
> first place that the U.S. military would be deployed.
> 
> As FTW has documented in previous stories, major deployments of
> U.S. and British forces had taken place before the attacks. And
> the U.S. Army and the CIA had been active in Uzbekistan for
> several years. There is now evidence that what the world is
> witnessing is a cold and calculated war plan - at least four years
> in the making - and that, from reading Brzezinski's own words
> about Pearl Harbor, the World Trade Center attacks were just the
> trigger needed to set the final conquest in motion.
> 
> ---------- 
> 
> FTW, November 7, 2001, 1200 PST - There's a quote often attributed
> to Allen Dulles after it was noted that the final 1964 report of
> the Warren Commission on the assassination of JFK contained
> dramatic inconsistencies. Those inconsistencies, in effect,
> disproved the Commission's own final conclusion that Lee Harvey
> Oswald acted alone on November 22, 1963. Dulles, a career spy,
> Wall Street lawyer, the CIA director whom JFK had fired after the
> 1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco - and the Warren Commission member who
> took charge of the investigation and final report - is reported to
> have said, "The American people don't read."
> 
> Some Americans do read. So do Europeans and Asians and Africans
> and Latin Americans.
> 
> World events since the attacks of September 11, 2001 have not only
> been predicted, but also planned, orchestrated and - as their
> architects would like to believe - controlled. The current Central
> Asian war is not a response to terrorism, nor is it a reaction to
> Islamic fundamentalism. It is in fact, in the words of one of the
> most powerful men on the planet, the beginning of a final conflict
> before total world domination by the United States leads to the
> dissolution of all national governments. This, says Council on
> Foreign Relations (CFR) member and former Carter National Security
> Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, will lead to nation states being
> incorporated into a new world order, controlled solely by economic
> interests as dictated by banks, corporations and ruling elites
> concerned with the maintenance (by manipulation and war) of their
> power. As a means of intimidation for the unenlightened reader who
> happens upon this frightening plan - the plan of the CFR -
> Brzezinski offers the alternative of a world in chaos unless the
> U.S. controls the planet by whatever means are necessary and
> likely to succeed.
> 
> This position is corroborated by Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D. a
> former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO
> Secretary General Manfred Werner. On November 6, he told FTW, "The
> interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The
> Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David
> Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and
> are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the
> next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They
> are fighting against citizens."
> 
> Brzezinski's own words - laid against the current official line
> that the United States is waging a war to end terrorism - are
> self-incriminating. In an ongoing series of articles, FTW has
> consistently established that the U.S. government had
> foreknowledge of the World Trade Center attacks and chose not to
> stop them because it needed to secure public approval for a war
> that is now in progress. It is a war, as described by Vice
> President Dick Cheney, "that may not end in our lifetimes." What
> that means is that it will not end until all armed groups,
> anywhere in the world, which possess the political, economic or
> military ability to resist the imposition of this dictatorship,
> have been destroyed.
> 
> These are the "terrorists" the U.S. now fights in Afghanistan and
> plans to soon fight all over the globe.
> 
> Before exposing Brzezinski (and those he represents) with his own
> words, or hearing more from Dr. Koeppl, it is worthwhile to take a
> look at Brzezinski's background.
> 
> According to his resume Brzezinski, holding a 1953 Ph.D.
>  from Harvard, lists the following achievements:
> 
> -- Counselor, Center for Strategic and International Studies
> -- Professor of American Foreign Policy, Johns Hopkins University
> -- National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter (1977-81)
> -- Trustee and founder of the Trilateral Commission
> -- International advisor of several major US/Global corporations
> -- Associate of Henry Kissinger
> -- Under Ronald Reagan - member of NSC-Defense Department Commission on
>    Integrated Long-Term Strategy
> -- Under Ronald Reagan - member of the President's Foreign Intelligence
>    Advisory Board
> -- Past member, Board of Directors, The Council on Foreign Relations
> -- 1988 - Co-chairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task Force.
> 
> Brzezinski is also a past attendee and presenter at several
> conferences of the Bliderberger group - a non-partisan affiliation
> of the wealthiest and most powerful families and corporations on
> the planet.
> 
> The Grand Chessboard 
> 
> Brzezinski sets the tone for his strategy by describing Russia and
> China as the two most important countries - almost but not quite
> superpowers - whose interests that might threaten the U.S.in
> Central Asia. Of the two, Brzezinski considers Russia to be the
> more serious threat. Both nations border Central Asia. In a lesser
> context he describes the Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Iran and Kazakhstan
> as essential "lesser" nations that must be managed by the U.S. as
> buffers or counterweights to Russian and Chinese moves to control
> the oil, gas and minerals of the Central Asian Republics
> (Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan).
> 
> He also notes, quite clearly (p.53) that any nation that might
> become predominant in Central Asia would directly threaten the
> current U.S. control of oil resources in the Persian Gulf. In
> reading the book it becomes clear why the U.S. had a direct motive
> for the looting of some $300 billion in Russian assets during the
> 1990s, destabilizing Russia's currency (1998) and ensuring that a
> weakened Russia would have to look westward to Europe for economic
> and political survival, rather than southward to Central Asia. A
> dependent Russia would lack the military, economic and political
> clout to exert influence in the region and this weakening of
> Russia would explain why Russian President Vladimir Putin has been
> such a willing ally of U.S. efforts to date. (See FTW Vol. IV, No.
> 1 - March 31, 2001)
> 
> An examination of selected quotes from "The Grand Chessboard," in
> the context of current events reveals the darker agenda behind
> military operations that were planned long before September 11th,
> 2001.
> 
>    "The last decade of the twentieth century has witnessed a
>    tectonic shift in world affairs. For the first time ever, a
>    non-Eurasian power has emerged not only as a key arbiter of
>    Eurasian power relations but also as the world's paramount
>    power. The defeat and collapse of the Soviet Union was the
>    final step in the rapid ascendance of a Western Hemisphere
>    power, the United States, as the sole and, indeed, the first
>    truly global power. (p. xiii)
>    
>    "But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian
>    challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of
>    also challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive
>    and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose
>    of this book. (p. xiv)
>    
>    "The attitude of the American public toward the external
>    projection of American power has been much more ambivalent.
>    The public supported America's engagement in World War II
>    largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on
>    Pearl Harbor. (pp 24-5)
>    
>    "For America, the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia. Now a
>    non-Eurasian power is preeminent in Eurasia - and America's
>    global primacy is directly dependent on how long and how
>    effectively its preponderance on the Eurasian continent is
>    sustained. (p.30)
>    
>    "America's withdrawal from the world or because of the sudden
>    emergence of a successful rival - would produce massive
>    international instability. It would prompt global anarchy."
>    (p.30)
>    
>    "In that context, how America 'manages' Eurasia is critical.
>    Eurasia is the globe's largest continent and is geopolitically
>    axial. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the
>    world's three most advanced and economically productive
>    regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control
>    over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's
>    subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania
>    geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent.
>    About 75 per cent of the world's people live in Eurasia, and
>    most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in
>    its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for
>    60 per cent of the world's GNP and about three-fourths of the
>    world's known energy resources." (p.31)
>    
>    "Two basic steps are thus required: first, to identify the
>    geostrategically dynamic Eurasian states that have the power
>    to cause a potentially important shift in the international
>    distribution of power and to decipher the central external
>    goals of their respective political elites and the likely
>    consequences of their seeking to attain them;. second, to
>    formulate specific U.S. policies to offset, co-opt, and/or
>    control the above. (p.40)
>    
>    "To put it in a terminology that harkens back to the more
>    brutal age of ancient empires, the three grand imperatives of
>    imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain
>    security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries
>    pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming
>    together." (p.40)
>    
>    "Henceforth, the United States may have to determine how to
>    cope with regional coalitions that seek to push America out of
>    Eurasia, thereby threatening America's status as a global
>    power." (p.55)
>    
>    "Uzbekistan - with its much more ethnically homogeneous
>    population of approximately 25 million and its leaders
>    emphasizing the country's historic glories - has become
>    increasingly assertive in affirming the region's new
>    postcolonial status." (p.95)
>    
>    "Thus, even the ethnically vulnerable Kazakhstan joined the
>    other Central Asian states in abandoning the Cyrillic alphabet
>    and replacing it with Latin script as adapted earlier by
>    Turkey. In effect, by the mid-1990s a bloc, quietly led by
>    Ukraine and comprising Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan
>    and sometimes also Kazakhstan, Georgia and Moldova, had
>    informally emerged to obstruct Russian efforts to use the CIS
>    as the tool for political integration." (p.114)
>    
>    "Hence, support for the new post-Soviet states - for
>    geopolitical pluralism in the space of the former Soviet
>    empire - has to be an integral part of a policy designed to
>    induce Russia to exercise unambiguously its European option.
>    Among these states. Three are geopolitically especially
>    important: Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, and Ukraine." (p. 121)
>    
>    "Uzbekistan, nationally the most vital and the most populous
>    of the central Asian states, represents the major obstacle to
>    any renewed Russian control over the region. Its independence
>    is critical to the survival of the other Central Asian states,
>    and it is the least vulnerable to Russian pressures." (p.121)
>    
>    Referring to an area he calls the "Eurasian Balkans" and a
>    1997 map in which he has circled the exact location of the
>    current conflict - describing it as the central region of
>    pending conflict for world dominance - Brzezinski writes:
>    "Moreover, they [the Central Asian Republics] are of
>    importance from the standpoint of security and historical
>    ambitions to at least three of their most immediate and more
>    powerful neighbors, namely Russia, Turkey and Iran, with China
>    also signaling an increasing political interest in the region.
>    But the Eurasian Balkans are infinitely more important as a
>    potential economic prize: an enormous concentration of natural
>    gas and oil reserves is located in the region, in addition to
>    important minerals, including gold." (p.124) [Emphasis added]
>    
>    The world's energy consumption is bound to vastly increase
>    over the next two or three decades. Estimates by the U.S.
>    Department of energy anticipate that world demand will rise by
>    more than 50 percent between 1993 and 2015, with the most
>    significant increase in consumption occurring in the Far East.
>    The momentum of Asia's economic development is already
>    generating massive pressures for the exploration and
>    exploitation of new sources of energy and the Central Asian
>    region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves
>    of natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of
>    Mexico, or the North Sea." (p.125)
>    
>    "Kazakhstan is the shield and Uzbekistan is the soul for the
>    region's diverse national awakenings." (p.130)
>    
>    "Uzbekistan is, in fact, the prime candidate for regional
>    leadership in Central Asia." (p.130)
>    
>    "Once pipelines to the area have been developed,
>    Turkmenistan's truly vast natural gas reserves augur a
>    prosperous future for the country's people. (p.132)
>    
>    "In fact, an Islamic revival - already abetted from the
>    outside not only by Iran but also by Saudi Arabia - is likely
>    to become the mobilizing impulse for the increasingly
>    pervasive new nationalisms, determined to oppose any
>    reintegration under Russian - and hence infidel - control."
>    (p.133).
>    
>    "For Pakistan, the primary interest is to gain Geostrategic
>    depth through political influence in Afghanistan - and to deny
>    to Iran the exercise of such influence in Afghanistan and
>    Tajikistan - and to benefit eventually from any pipeline
>    construction linking Central Asia with the Arabian Sea."
>    (p.139)
>    
>    "Moreover, sensible Russian leaders realize that the
>    demographic explosion underway in the new states means that
>    their failure to sustain economic growth will eventually
>    create an explosive situation along Russia's entire southern
>    frontier."
>    
>    (p.141) [This would explain why Putin would welcome U.S.
>    military presence to stabilize the region.]
>    
>    "Turkmenistan. has been actively exploring the construction of
>    a new pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian
>    Sea." (p.145)
>    
>    "It follows that America's primary interest is to help ensure
>    that no single power comes to control this geopolitical space
>    and that the global community has unhindered financial and
>    economic access to it." (p148)
>    
>    "China's growing economic presence in the region and its
>    political stake in the area's independence are also congruent
>    with America's interests." (p.149)
>    
>    "America is now the only global superpower, and Eurasia is the
>    globe's central arena. Hence, what happens to the distribution
>    of power on the Eurasian continent will be of decisive
>    importance to America's global primacy and to America's
>    historical legacy." (p.194)
>    
>    "the Eurasian Balkans - threatens to become a cauldron of
>    ethnic conflict and great-power rivalry." (p.195)
>    
>    "Without sustained and directed American involvement, before
>    long the forces of global disorder could come to dominate the
>    world scene. And the possibility of such a fragmentation is
>    inherent in the geopolitical tensions not only of today's
>    Eurasia but of the world more generally." (p.194)
>    
>    "With warning signs on the horizon across Europe and Asia, any
>    successful American policy must focus on Eurasia as a whole
>    and be guided by a Geostrategic design." (p.197)
>    
>    "That puts a premium on maneuver and manipulation in order to
>    prevent the emergence of a hostile coalition that could
>    eventually seek to challenge America's primacy." (p.198)
>    
>    "The most immediate task is to make certain that no state or
>    combination of states gains the capacity to expel the United
>    States from Eurasia or even to diminish significantly its
>    decisive arbitration role." (p.198)
>    
>    "In the long run, global politics are bound to become
>    increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of hegemonic
>    power in the hands of a single state. Hence, America is not
>    only the first, as well as the only, truly global superpower,
>    but it is also likely to be the very last." (p.209)
>    
>    "Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural
>    society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus
>    on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a
>    truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat."
>    (p.211) [Emphasis added] The Horror - And Comments
>    
>  From Someone Who Worked With Brzezinski
> 
> Brzezinski's book is sublimely arrogant. While singing the praises
> of the IMF and the World Bank, which have economically terrorized
> nations on every continent, and while totally ignoring the
> worldwide terrorist actions of the U.S. government that have led
> to genocide; cluster bombings of civilian populations from Kosovo,
> to Laos, to Iraq, to Afghanistan; the development and battlefield
> use of both biological and chemical agents such as Sarin gas; and
> the financial rape of entire cultures it would leave the reader
> believing that such actions are for the good of mankind.
> 
> While seconded from the German defense ministry to NATO in the
> late 1970s, Dr. Johannes Koeppl - mentioned at the top of this
> article - traveled to Washington on more than one occasion. He
> also met with Brzezinski in the White House on more than one
> occasion. His other Washington contacts included Steve Larabee
> from the CFR, John J. McCloy, former CIA Director, economist
> Milton Friedman, and officials from Carter's Office of Management
> and Budget. He is the first person I have ever interviewed who has
> made a direct presentation at a Bliderberger conference and he has
> also made numerous presentations to sub-groups of the Trilateral
> Commission. That was before he spoke out against them.
> 
> His fall from grace was rapid after he realized that Brzezinski
> was part of a group intending to impose a world dictatorship. "In
> 1983/4 I warned of a take-over of world governments being
> orchestrated by these people. There was an obvious plan to subvert
> true democracies and selected leaders were not being chosen based
> upon character but upon their loyalty to an economic system run by
> the elites and dedicated to preserving their power.
> 
> "All we have now are pseudo-democracies."
> 
> Koeppl recalls meeting U.S. Congressman Larry McDonald in
> Nuremburg in the early 80s. McDonald, who was then contemplating a
> run for the Presidency, was a severe critic of these elites. He
> was killed in the Russian shootdown of Korean Air flight 007 in
> 1985. Koeppl believes that it might have been an assassination.
> Over the years many writers have made these allegations about 007
> and the fact that someone with Koeppl's credentials believes that
> an entire plane full of passengers would be destroyed to eliminate
> one man offers a chilling opinion of the value placed on human
> life by the powers that be.
> 
> In 1983, Koeppl warned, through Op-Ed pieces published in NEWSWEEK
> and elsewhere, that Brzezinski and the CFR were part of an effort
> to impose a global dictatorship. His fall from grace was swift.
> "It was a criminal society that I was dealing with. It was not
> possible to publish anymore in the so-called respected
> publications. My 30 year career in politics ended.
> 
> "The people of the western world have been trained to be good
> consumers; to focus on money, sports cars, beauty, consumer goods.
> They have not been trained to look for character in people.
> Therefore what we need is education for politicians, a form of
> training that instills in them a higher sense of ethics than
> service to money. There is no training now for world leaders. This
> is a shame because of the responsibility that leaders hold to
> benefit all mankind rather than to blindly pursue destructive
> paths.
> 
> "We also need education for citizens to be more efficient in their
> democracies, in addition to education for politicians that will
> create a new network of elites based upon character and social
> intelligence."
> 
> Koeppl, who wrote his 1989 doctoral thesis on NATO management,
> also authored a 1989 book - largely ignored because of its
> controversial revelations - entitled "The Most Important Secrets
> in the World." He maintains a German language web site
> atwww.antaris.com and he can be reached by email
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> As to the present conflict Koeppl expressed the gravest concerns,
> "This is more than a war against terrorism. This is a war against
> the citizens of all countries. The current elites are creating so
> much fear that people don't know how to respond. But they must
> remember. This is a move to implement a world dictatorship within
> the next five years. There may not be another chance."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

NSP Lista isprobava demokratiju u praksi

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrBE8.bVKZIq
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Одговори путем е-поште