STOP NATO: �NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[I don't know how to begin to take this advertizing
blurb for the new global imperialism apart, except to
speculate what similar pseudo-post-structuralist
gibberish might be applied to the reigns of Attila the
Hun and the Third Reich. Change a few names....Jim,
Les, Kole and others please help.] 

Observer Comment Extra
Empire 
This extract from 'Empire', drawn from the book's
preface, argues that the transformations of the new
global order make the emerging Empire quite different
from previous eras of imperial dominance and
capitalist expansion, opening new spaces for political
projects seeking to construct a truly democratic
global society
Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri
Sunday July 15, 2001
The Observer
Empire is materializing before our very eyes. Over the
past several decades, as colonial regimes were
overthrown and then precipitously after the Soviet
barriers to the capitalist world market finally
collapsed, we have witnessed an irresistible and
irreversible globalization of economic and cultural
exchanges. 
Along with the global market and global circuits of
production has emerged a global order, a new logic and
structure of rule - in short, a new form of
sovereignty. Empire is the political subject that
effectively regulates these global exchanges, the
sovereign power that governs the world.
The passage to Empire emerges from the twilight of
modern sovereignty. In contrast to imperialism, Empire
establishes no territorial center of power and does
not rely on fixed boundaries and barriers. It is a
decentered and deterritorializing apparatus of rule
that progressively incorporates the entire global
realm within its open, expanding frontiers. Empire
manages hybrid identities, flexible hierarchies, and
plural exchanges through modulating networks of
command. The distinct national colors of the
imperialist map of the world have merged and blended
in the imperial global rainbow. 
Most significant, the spatial divisions of the three
Worlds (First, Second, and Third) have been scrambled
so that we continually find the First world in the
Third, the Third in the First, and the Second almost
nowhere at all. Capital seems to be faced with a
smooth world - or really, a world defined by new and
complex regimes of differentiation and homogenization,
deterritorialization and reterritorialization. 
Many locate the ultimate authority that rules over the
processes of globalization and the new world order in
the United States. Proponents praise the United States
as the world leader and sole superpower, and
detractors denounce it as the imperialist oppressor.
Both these views rest on the assumption that the
United States has simply donned the mantle of global
power that the European nations have now let fall. If
the nineteenth century was a British century, the
twentieth century has been an American century; or
really if modernity was European, then postmodernity
is American. The most damning charge critics can
level, then, is that the United States is repeating
the practices of old European imperialists, while
proponents celebrate the United States as a more
efficient and more benevolent world leader, getting
right what the Europeans got wrong. 
Our basic hypothesis, however, that a new imperial
form of sovereignty has emerged, contradicts both
these views. The United States does not, and indeed no
nation-state can today, form the center of an
imperialist project. Imperialism is over. No nation
will be world leader in the way modern European
nations were. 
We should emphasise that we use 'Empire' here not as a
metaphor, which would require demonstration of the
resemblances between today's world order and the
Empires of Rome, China the Americas, and so forth, but
rather as a concept, which calls primarily for a
theoretical approach. The concept of Empire is
characterised fundamentally by a lack of boundaries:
Empire's rule has no limits. 
First and foremost, then, the concept of Empire posits
a regime that effectively encompasses the spatial
totality, or really that rules over the entire
'civilized' world. No territorial boundaries limit its
reign. 
Second, the concept of Empire presents itself not as a
historical regime originating in conquest, but rather
as an order that effectively suspends history and
thereby fixes the existing state of affairs for
eternity. From the perspective of Empire, this is the
way things will always be and they way they were
always meant to be. In other words, Empire presents
its rule not as a transitory moment in the movement of
history, but as a regime with no territorial
boundaries and in this sense outside of history or at
the end of history. 
Third, the rule of Empire operates on all registers of
the social order extending down to the depths of the
social world. Empire not only manages a territory and
a population but also creates the very world it
inhabits. It not only regulates human interactions but
also seeks directly to rule over human nature. The
object of its rule is social life in its entirety, and
thus Empire presents the paradigmatic form of
biopower.
Finally, although the practice of Empire is
continually bathed in blood, the concept of Empire is
always dedicated to peace - a perpetual and universal
peace outside of history.
The Empire we are faced with wields enormous powers of
oppression and destruction, but that fact should not
make us nostalgic in any way for the old forms of
domination. The passage to Empire and its processes of
globalization offer new possibilities to the force of
liberation. 
Globalization, of course, is not one thing, and the
multiple processes that we recognize as globalization
are not unified or univocal. Our political task, we
will argue, is not simply to resist these processes
but to reorganize them and redirect them toward new
ends. The creative forces of the multitude that
sustain Empire are also capable of autonomously
constructing a counter-Empire, an alternative
political organization of global flows and exchanges.
The struggles to contest and subvert Empire, as well
as those to construct a real alternative, will thus
take place on the imperial terrain itself - indeed,
such new struggles have already begun to emerge.
Through these struggles, and many more like them, the
multitude will have to invent new democratic forms and
a new constituent power that will one day take us
through and beyond Empire. 
Michael Hardt is Assistant Professor in the Literature
Program at Duke University. Antonio Negri is an
independent writer and researcher and an inmate at
Rebibbia Prison, Rome. He has been a Lecturer in
Political Science at the University of Paris and a
Professor of Political Science at the University of
Padua.
Excerpted from Empire, by Michael Hardt and Antonio
Negri, published by Harvard University Press. 
 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to