I agree that a system SMI-S for Solaris would automatically pick up
the target. It's just that I need to monitor that effort and ensure
the work occurs.
Another area which is similar to SMI-S in my mind is FMA. It's a
Solaris wide effort which I need to monitor. At this point I'm not
sure if there will be any changes required in the daemon.
On Sep 21, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Dale Ghent wrote:
On Sep 21, 2006, at 9:04 AM, Rick McNeal wrote:
I'll add the SMI-S provider to the list. That's one which I'll
probably need some help on. I've got no real experience in the SMI-
S realm.
That was really more of a general feature musing on my part for
Solaris as a whole, which iscsitgt would certainly be a part of. A
SMI-S CIMOM for solaris would dovetail well with the way solaris is
headed in the storage world. As for the tech behind /providing/ SMI-
S, that's a mystery that I'm trying to unravel for myself, but I'm
sure the people who work on Enterprise Storage Manager could lend
some advice on.
/dale
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
----
Rick McNeal
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail ... but, a true
friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn ... that was fun!"
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
