Yes, I would expect to see an assertion generated by: t10_cmd_state_machine() http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/iscsi/iscsitgtd/t10_sam.c#456 You stack trace does not have the level of detail in the calls that I was expecting to see. Maybe because it is Sol10u4 rather than a Nevada build.
Let's hope that Jim Dunham & his team can make some progress soon on fixing these bugs. Hopefully you may get chance next week to do further testing along the lines suggested. Until then.. Thanks Nigel Smith This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
