it is true that we are using x86_64 as well as our build is svn_68

Andrew Hettinger
http://Prominic.NET  ||  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel:  866.339.3169 (toll free) -or- +1.217.356.2888 x.110 (int'l)
Fax: 866.372.3356 (toll free) -or- +1.217.356.3356            (int'l)
Mobile direct: 1.217.621.2540
CompTIA A+, CompTIA Network+, MCP


                                                                       
             Nigel Smith                                               
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                         
             reeserve.co.uk>                                            To
             Sent by:                  [email protected] 
             storage-discuss-b                                          cc
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                         
             s.org                                                 Subject
                                       Re: [storage-discuss] Help with 
                                       ISCSI Target                    
             11/27/2007 04:20                                          
             AM                                                        
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       




Chris,
I checked the latest snoop file, and I am not seeing any
difference in the login response packet from the target.
I would have expected to see some additional key/value
pairs if the 'fixed' target was running.
(That is my understanding of what it does, but I have not
tested it for myself)
The rest of the trace looks very similar with the same
'hang' by the target after the first 'read' by the initiator.

It seems to me that something must have gone wrong in
how you installed the new target daemon.

I think maybe what has happened is that Andrew has supplied
you with a iscsitgtd for a 64-bit kernel architecture (amd64),
but that you are using a 32-bit kernel (i386).

I think you can confirm your architecture with the command
'isainfo -kv'. So run that & report back here.

Maybe another issue is that you are using build 'snv_76' of the
kernel and I suspect that Andrew's target is for an
older build.

If I'm right on either/both these points, then this could
explain the 'weirdness '.  I think what we need is a
iscsitgt compiled for the architecture and the same build
that you are running.

I'm not sure how to do the compile myself, and I think the
iscsitgtd that Andrew supplied was compiled by Rick McNeal.
(Rick was the original author of the Solaris iscsi target,
but he is no longer working for Sun.)

I would like to be able to compile the iscsitgtd myself.
Maybe with some spare time, I can figure out how to do it.

Now that many of you USA people are back from your thanksgiving
break, maybe other people will jump in with opinions & advice...

Best Regards
Nigel Smith


This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

<<inline: graycol.gif>>

<<inline: pic33947.gif>>

<<inline: ecblank.gif>>

_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to