Hi Mike

Just want to point out that the previous mail from Larry (llw3) was  
the response from Qlogic on this subject (Larry works for Qlogic).  
This is a decision driven by QLogic. I agree that its hard to see  
full range of issues without having access to qlogic development  
docs. But as stated by Larry, the firmware differences do inhibit us  
from doing a comstar target mode support for 2G adapters using the  
qlt driver. Hopefully Qlogic will respond to your post to explain it  
further.

Thanks
Sumit

On Jul 4, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Mike La Spina wrote:

> Hi Sumit,
>
> I understand the business logic of going forward with the qla24xx  
> and up MultiID firmware releases. Unfortunately this will handicap  
> the community participation in testing and exploration of the  
> COMSTAR project. Many shops would be interested in reusing the  
> existing 23xx FC adaptors to create targets in the dev and test  
> worlds and also to build proof of concept environments. The ability  
> to use the older adaptor becomes an enabler on the interest side  
> where the IT shops do not need to invest much to get involved and  
> this can bring the level of acceptance and promotion to a highly  
> productive state and that makes the isp2312 device development  
> effort very worth while. Sometimes business driven decisions are  
> not optimal to emerging technologies.
>
> I have some limited skills in with C and when looking at the  
> Solaris snv_90 code it does appear to be possible to include a  
> isp2312 chip without a rewrite since the qlt driver is interfaced  
> with the mailbox method.
>
> It appears to be some registers, speed and the firmware address  
> range issue that would need modification.
>
> Without having access to the qlogic development docs or source it  
> is hard to see the full range of issues.
>
> The 2300 series of adaptor was very popular and is in good supply  
> out there. It would be a real win for the community if we could  
> convince management to the hidden benifits of it's inclusion.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> storage-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to