On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:56 PM, James Carlson <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Memishian writes: >> >> > > How are the global pieces managed from dladm? >> > >> > I have generic get/set interfaces exposed from libdladm, and these are >> > implemented (inside libdladm) using libscf. I use the same interfaces >> > both for dladm and for the actual daemon. >> >> So [link] is now optional for set-linkprop and reset-linkprop? Also, for >> show-linkprop is "--" shown for the LINK field, or something else? > > Something else. > > The properties in question are _not_ associated with links. They're > associated with bridges.
So essentially, there's a separate command for the non-link specific properties? > > The ones that are associated with links are stored in linkprop > normally, and the [link] for that is certainly not "optional." > >> (Is >> this covered in an ARC case already?) > > Yep. 2008/055 Without wanting to pour salt in some recent wounds, I'll just say I hope to look at that when possible. _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
