Hi Bing, On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Bing Zhao - Sun Microsystems <bing.z...@sun.com> wrote: > If you add a static-config twice, the iscsiadm will output the "unexpected > OS error". > > bash-3.2# iscsiadm add static-config > iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:93893ec6-ec6c-6409-993a-e4bedb506cab.boot,10.13.49.24 > bash-3.2# iscsiadm add static-config > iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:93893ec6-ec6c-6409-993a-e4bedb506cab.boot,10.13.49.24 > iscsiadm: unexpected OS error > iscsiadm: Unable to complete operation
Yes indeed, I know that, I saw the related bug report too. > Since you run the script in parallel, this case may happen. What will happen > if we run it not in parallel? ok, I did some more tests. - if we don't run it in parallel, I wasn't able to get the same result. - I decided to run the test with 20 targets in a testA and 20 other targets in a testB. Then I ran the two tests in parallel: I got the os error. So it confirm the bug. For me it doesn't change the thing: even if we run it parallel with the same targets I'm not supposed to end with a corrupted iscsi database. We could probably simplify the test but I didn't found the time for. > Do you mean that when you disable the mpxio and then enable it, the problem > doesn't exist any more? no, I mean that if mpxio-disable="no", I can't reproduce the problem; and with mpxio-disable="yes", I can. > You know that the machine should reboot after modifying the iscsi.conf. yes. Don't hesitate to ask me some more question if I wasn't clear on some points. Best regards, -- William _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list storage-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss