Hi William:
Maybe you met below problems:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6929801
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6906519
And currently, we are working on it.
Regards,
Bing
William Dauchy wrote:
Hi Bing,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Bing Zhao - Sun Microsystems
<bing.z...@sun.com> wrote:
If you add a static-config twice, the iscsiadm will output the "unexpected
OS error".
bash-3.2# iscsiadm add static-config
iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:93893ec6-ec6c-6409-993a-e4bedb506cab.boot,10.13.49.24
bash-3.2# iscsiadm add static-config
iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:93893ec6-ec6c-6409-993a-e4bedb506cab.boot,10.13.49.24
iscsiadm: unexpected OS error
iscsiadm: Unable to complete operation
Yes indeed, I know that, I saw the related bug report too.
Since you run the script in parallel, this case may happen. What will happen
if we run it not in parallel?
ok, I did some more tests.
- if we don't run it in parallel, I wasn't able to get the same result.
- I decided to run the test with 20 targets in a testA and 20 other
targets in a testB. Then I ran the two tests in parallel: I got the os
error. So it confirm the bug.
For me it doesn't change the thing: even if we run it parallel with
the same targets I'm not supposed to end with a corrupted iscsi
database.
We could probably simplify the test but I didn't found the time for.
Do you mean that when you disable the mpxio and then enable it, the problem
doesn't exist any more?
no, I mean that if mpxio-disable="no", I can't reproduce the problem;
and with mpxio-disable="yes", I can.
You know that the machine should reboot after modifying the iscsi.conf.
yes.
Don't hesitate to ask me some more question if I wasn't clear on some points.
Best regards,
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
